« The Language of Life & Death | Main | The First "Capitalist" Experiment »

On Why Woman Was Made For Man

Genesis 2:18, 22-24: Then the Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him." And the Lord God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man...And the man said, "This is now bone of my bones, And flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman, Because she was taken out of Man." For this cause a man shall leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and they shall become one flesh." NASB

Woman was made from man for man because he needed her. Because he was alone. Even among the splendid animals, he was alone. He had no one to help him in a way that matched him.

alone, adj.: without anyone or anything else, lacking companionship

Most of us are probably aware that we don't always understand our needs. We know our wants pretty well, but perhaps not our deepest needs. But certainly we know we need help (provision) for the meeting of both our needs and our wants. The first man, Adam, was in need. Enter woman.

help v. tr.:
1. To give assistance or support; aid
2. To contribute to the furtherance of; promote
3. To ease; relieve
4. To change for the better; improve
5. To wait on

Much of the complementarian material I've read seems to imply that woman needs man more than he needs her: without him, she has no leader. Without him, she has no purpose. In many ways this is true. Even nuns in a convent serve God in Christ, Who is represented in male terms. But then, so do monks in a monastery.

But such rhetoric seems to place emphasis on woman's relation to man in terms of #s 1, 2, and 5 above (except when it comes to sex; then perhaps it's #3) to the neglect of #4. Certainly both men and women need all five types of help from persons of both genders; this is the function of the Body of Christ. But the point is, woman was made for man not because she needed him, but because he needed her. (I think she does need him, but that's not why she was made.)

Both man and woman were made that they might look to one another, but first to God. If man depends upon woman to the exclusion of God, then trouble results. If woman depends upon man to the exclusion of God, then trouble results. But some seem to think that for a woman, to look to God is to look to a man. These persons, however, are really suggesting that for a man, to look to God is to look to woman, for justification. And this is one of the problems with certain complementarian doctrine.

Comments

Christiane Carlson-Thies over at CBE does an excellent job with this topic at: http://www.cbeinternational.org/new/free_articles/ManandWomanatCreation.pdf

Posted by: Kristine at November 26, 2008 6:15 PM

Thanks for that link, Kristine! Wow, I could've written that article myself (though not nearly so well). Carlson-Thies has seen the same things I have (a few years ahead!) concerning complementarian interpretation of Scripture, and articulated them very well. Especially where she shows how such interp. transposes Paul's words into Genesis. I pointed out something similar about a year ago in a post about John Piper's words on marriage: it seemed he used Eph. 5 to reinterpret Genesis 2 rather than using Gen. 2 to illuminate Eph. 5 as Paul himself did.

Posted by: Bonnie at November 28, 2008 12:22 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

About

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.