I'm not quite sure I follow the logic here:
The initial paragraph alone has enough gaps to make the Grand Canyon look like a mud puddle.
« Women and firearms (or not) | Main | The "us vs. them" mentality »
I'm not quite sure I follow the logic here:
The initial paragraph alone has enough gaps to make the Grand Canyon look like a mud puddle.
That's a KJV only site, as well. You'll find lots of things to drive a truck through.
Posted by: Steve at July 1, 2008 8:25 PMROFLOL that first paragraph was COMICAL!!!
Posted by: Keer at July 1, 2008 10:33 PMThe illustration that Cathy Corle uses is two pictures of the same woman. The first one has her in a nice dress. She asked a group of ladies what they noticed about this woman, and they answered her face. Then she showed them the picture of the same woman in a pair of jeans and asked what they noticed. They said their eyes were immediately drawn to the crotch area!
I wonder what the ladies would notice if they were shown the picture of the woman in a pair of jeans first?
Posted by: Bonnie at July 1, 2008 10:52 PMSpeaking of "trucks," I'm thinking Macks.
Besides the other weirdisms per that post (and I'm not advocating garb that's deliberately immodest), I can't figure out why a woman (or a man, for that matter) is personally liable for the choice or actions of a third party ...???
Posted by: Kristine at July 1, 2008 11:32 PMThe writer can't even make up his mind.
First he says it's sin, then he says you have to search the word and reach your own conviction...
Otherwise, it's sad on every level
So did Jesus wear dresses?
Posted by: Barbara at July 3, 2008 8:30 PMIf you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.