« Letitia snags a win at the EO/Wheatstone Academy Symposium | Main | Feminization and the church, part....: the feminization of America »

Coming out of hopelessness

Last Friday's Breakpoint commentary hit close to home, and brought up something crucial that I think has been missing in many discussions of how to reach those who are hurting.

Prison Fellowship Ministries president Mark Earley wrote of Helping Those Who Feel Helpless. It's been said that people need Jesus, not therapy; salvation from sin, not strokes for their self-serving emotional affectations, and this is surely true. But I think many are unaware of the state of utter hopelessness that many hurting people live in.

It is not unusual for people to lash out at others to release pent-up anger and hopelessness. At Prison Fellowship, we have seen this over and over again, with prisoners who resort to violence as a way of dealing with abuse, loneliness, and fear. But there is another way that people respond to these feelings--they take it out on themselves.

In speaking out against the cultural normalization, shrugging off, or glamorizing of self-destructive behavior, Earley urges us to see self-injury for what it is: a coping mechanism.

I know this only too well. There is suicide and depression in my family, and 1/3 of my own life was spent turning unspeakable emotional turmoil inward in the form of bulimia. On the "other side" now, I can look back and see a pervasive sense of hopelessness and helplessness, even long after I "knew" the gospel.

How can this be? I'd say that I didn't really "know" the gospel. The gospel I'd heard and thought I needed to live was mostly a bunch of "shoulds" that I couldn't possibly live up to. Far from needing to hear how sinful and in need of salvation I was (I knew that already, for gosh sakes!), what I needed was what one of To Write Love on Her Arms founder's suicidal friend needed: friends to stick by her, treat her well, show her that she was worthwhile, and remind her that she was truly loved.

The group has rallied the support of bands like Switchfoot with the simple message to love the brokenhearted.

Folks, the person overcome with hopelessness and helplessness doesn't want or need to hear about his or her sin. No, he needs to be convinced that there is goodness in and around him: the goodness of God's creation, the imago dei. He needs to know and be shown that this good is truly good. He needs to be shown that he is redeemable, and that the goodness of God is available to him.

You see, for many, "love" is not touchy-feely lovey-dovey Jesus-is-my-boyfriend/girlfriend sentiment, it's simply hope, and a sense of worth and power to overcome. And this worth is what most of the self-esteem talk is about. It's not that nobody needs good self-esteem, of course they do. We just need to clarify what proper self-esteem is, which is knowing who we are in Christ. The good and the bad.

So to those who only know the bad, let's show them the good.

Comments

Hi Bonnie,

Thank you for sharing some very personal aspects of your life.

As you are probably aware, I am one to criticize what I see as the "lovey-dovey" presentation of the Gospel message (in fact, I'm prepping a post on the "in love with Jesus" lines we hear in worship songs). I have always advocated a proclamation of the entire message. The good news of the Gospel is that mankind has sinned, is in need of redemption, AND that, through the grace, mercy, and love of God, we have a means to receive that redemption. I hope we never get ourselves in a situation where we only give the depressed individual half of the story. Indeed, let us make sure we let them know of the assurance of that in which we believe.

Posted by: Rusty at May 14, 2008 3:29 PM

Thanks for your comment, Rusty. I’m not in love with the “lovey-dovey” gospel either, as I’ve expressed before. But sometimes, what appears to be shallow comfort or pandering to emotional immaturity is actually a dose of balm that a hurting person deeply needs. As you say, grace and mercy must never be left out of the picture.

Posted by: Bonnie at May 14, 2008 11:08 PM

Hi Bonnie,

Is it possible to both give a hurting person a "dose of balm" and to provide them with the entire Gospel message? I don't think you're advocating an either / or situation, but it seems that Christians sometimes emphasize one side or the other too much.

Posted by: Rusty at May 15, 2008 12:04 PM

Rusty, thanks for your question. I’m not advocating an either/or, although while there is both forgiveness and judgment when it comes to the truth of sin, “gospel” does mean “good news.” But what I’m advocating is an attitude, a way of thinking – an approach to people that proceeds with wisdom and discernment.

Getting to know people is important, as are timing and openness to receiving them as they are. In basic things, people are the same, but in particulars we can be quite different, which makes personal interaction complex and something to be approached carefully, not with snap judgments, reactions, formulas, or preconceptions.

And we can’t expect others to take us seriously or be honest with themselves if we aren’t modeling this, and we can’t model it if we’re not doing it.

I believe that an approach to worship and presentation of the gospel that shuts out emotion is mistaken, and want to distinguish that it’s not whether or not emotion should be part of worship and faith, but that emotional maturity should be encouraged. (A modicum of this is necessary to properly minister to the emotionally damaged.) Many people need a good deal of emotional healing (milk) before they can move on to meatier things. Expecting them to just “give it to Jesus” or “deal with it” without leading them or walking with them through the (often ugly, messy, and painful) process is quite unkind.

Hope that explains where I coming from :-)

Posted by: Bonnie at May 16, 2008 10:54 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

About

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.