« Molly Pitcher | Main | Feminism's Christian roots »

"Our Wounds"

I came across the following commentary on a women's site. It raised some questions:

"All women carry a wound deep in their hearts and souls. That wound is different for all of us. You know immediately what I'm talking about, don't you? That certain subject or person that has hurt you so deeply - that even if you have made strides to forgive and move on - it's like the embers are still inside of you burning a little bit.

Acknowledge that that wound exists in your life. Our wounds can have a hold on our life, you know. They can cripple us, if we let them. We can foster the hurt so much, that the wound changes who we are. We become a victim, never being able to overcome and rise above this particularly, painful point in our lives.

We need to realize that Satan sent these wounds to us on purpose. We did not suffer them by accident. Whatever your wound is - Satan sent it personally to YOU. He sent it to hinder you from being who you were meant to be. Are you going to let him?

We can submit our wounds to the Lord and allow Him to work in us through them. God can use our wounds as a ministry for him. Some days that thought may seem impossible - but we need to keep the faith. If God believes in us, who are we to give up on ourselves?

Don't let Satan win. Don't let him impact the course of your life. Don't let him use your wound to make you feel ugly, unworthy, dirty, unwanted, hopeless, or small. Don't let him force you to "settle" for less than the best you know you can give in your life."

Here are my questions:

How does the first sentence strike you? Do all women "carry a women deep in their hearts and souls" - or sin? What's the difference? Why?

What about, "Whatever your wound is - Satan sent it personally to YOU. He sent it to hinder you from being who you were meant to be"?

The author seems to infer that every "wound" we experience is "sent" by Satan. Is the assumption underlying the author's statement troubling? If her assertion is true, does it suggests that God is somehow surprised by our painful life experiences and is left to scurry along behind us, cleaning up messes as best He can, ex post facto? God can and does "use our wounds as a ministry for him." But where is His sovereignty?

Furthermore, can Satan "hinder you from being who you were meant to be?" Is the Adversary capable of such? Is he the flip side of God, equally omnipresent and omnipotent in an evil way, or is Satan a created being subject to divine law, rule and will? And what about the concept of victimhood in para. 2, expounded upon in para. 3? What about the final paragraph?

Comments

Kristine,thanks so much for posting that. Was that Joyce Meyer? I'm SO TIRED of women being asked to focus inward on their so-called wounds. This sort of examination creates a self-centerd, not a Christ-centered view of life. I don't need encouragement, I don't need to have better self-esteem, I don't want to focus on me.

Posted by: Sarah Flashing at March 9, 2008 5:44 PM

I think that whoever wrote this sees a valid need but it's too bad that both the proposed explanation and solution are so faulty.

Surely we all carry wounds of some type; it’s pretty unavoidable in this world. The difference between wounds and sin in our hearts is that sin is ours, yet not all of our wounds are a result of our own sin.

I think the second paragraph is good; we do need to acknowledge hurts and deal with them in a healthy way. But Satan doesn’t “send” wounds. God allows Satan to wound us (see Job). We then either allow the wounds to defeat us, or trust God to work them for good.

Satan lies to us. He tells us that mistreatment or “bad” things happen to us because we are “ugly, unworthy, dirty, unwanted, hopeless, or small.” (Or, that we're not at fault when we really are :-) ) But it's not that we ought not “let him force [us] to 'settle' for less than the best we know we can give in our lives," but that we trust and believe that we are who God says He’s made us, in Him, through Christ.

Posted by: Bonnie at March 9, 2008 11:02 PM

Kristine,

As a man, I'm disappointed when a topic that is universal, is put forward as a gender specific topic. Any further statements post the inference that the topic is gender specific, thereafter ellaborates on and only further displays the agenda, even if unknown, of creating a victim or of victimhood.

Everyone carries the burden of their past, self-inflicted or not, pain and the memory of pain persists for a reason. Paul states that iron sharpens iron, and that struggles are for our benefit, and growth. It is a failure of growth to allow our past to dictate our future, however it is foolish to rely on our ability to discern the truth of our situation.

We all see through a glass darkly, none of us having perfect vision of our circumstances. Only through the grace of God, and inworking of the Holy Spirit can we discern the righteous use of our pain.

Posted by: Eric at March 10, 2008 12:00 PM

The post in question from which I quoted does have a distinct Joyce Meyerish ring to it, but it wasn't written by Meyer. I pulled it off another group blog to which I contribute devotional material, called "Inner Fulfillment."

I was likewise disappointed with the author's somewhat pedestrian, self-centered and rather simplistic approach to what is often a complex topic with many shades of gray. I concur that the proposed explanation and solution are faulty.

Eric, I appreciate your comments. I agree that this topic is not gender specific, altho it was posted in a blog that is. The subject is indeed universal, and as old a Job.

Posted by: Kristine at March 10, 2008 9:52 PM

I humbly accept your correction, and withdraw my critisism, concerning the feminist agenda.

I sincerely appreciate and enjoy your blog, and find it very informative and instructive. Hearing about the Christian issues faced by women, helps me understand and develop my attitude and interpretation of how women's theological distinctions and attitudes.

I apologize if my comments didn't reflect my respect and appreciation.

Posted by: Eric at March 12, 2008 9:53 AM

Eric, I just wanted to thank you for your comment. What you are illustrating in tandem with what we are doing on this blog is my dream and vision for this blog and for male-female relations in general.

Posted by: Bonnie at March 13, 2008 10:04 AM

Eric,

No harm, no foul. :)

God bless you.

Posted by: Kristine at March 13, 2008 11:36 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

About

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.