« Worldview Tests: Do You Make the Grade? | Main | Spotlight on Darfur 2 »

Quotable Schaeffer

It is much more comfortable, of course, to go on speaking the gospel only in familiar phrases to the middle classes. But that would be as wrong as, for example, if Hudson Taylor had sent missionaries to China and then told them to learn only one of three separate dialects that the people spoke. In such a case, only one group out of three could hear the gospel. We cannot imagine Hudson Taylor being so hard-hearted. Of course he knew men do not believe without a work of the Holy Spirit, and his life was a life of prayer for this to happen; but he also knew that men cannot believe without hearing the gospel. Each generation of the Church in each setting has the responsibility of communicating the gospel in understandable terms, considering the language and thought-forms of that setting.

In a parallel way we are being as overwhelmingly unfair, even selfish, towards our own generation...The reason often we cannot speak to our children, let alone other people's, is because we have not taken the time to understand how different their thought-forms are from ours...So what is said in this book is not merely a matter of intellectual debate. It is not of interest only to academics. It is utterly crucial for those of us who are serious about communicating the Christian gospel in the twentieth century.

-Francis Schaeffer, Escape from Reason

Last night when I reread this section, it reminded me of a discussion/debate in the women's bible study I teach at my church. As we discussed Paul's passion for the gospel and the role of apologetics in evangelism, I was once again confronted with the false dichotomy of the heart and mind. Certainly we have no power outside of or independent of God to persuade anyone to have faith in Him, but apparently I've delluded myself into thinking that more people than not accept the role of the intellect as an instrument of God.

What I was able to gather in our discussion was that God's power is only actualized when the fact of Jesus' sacrifice for our sins is invoked in an outreach situation. This made me wonder if perhaps Romans 1:16 is being totally misunderstood:

For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. Romans 1:16

God's power certainly is not limited to what we would consider the doctrinal content of the gospel, but I have a feeling that this is exactly the nature of my battle this week.

Comments


Interesting that you should be grappling with this. I, too, find that the words, the theology, of the gospel are seen to be the sum total of the message. Lately, though, God has been leading me to books and situations and scriptures that are causing me to rethink this Brain Only Gospel. If God had left the gospel to be for the intellect only, then Jesus could have arrived here, been our sacrifice and sent us all a letter. Instead He came, lived with us, ate with us, put up with us and loved us. I do believe my generation has become a bit unbalanced in the presentation of the gospel. It has become 4 Points, a Choice and a Prayer. Jesus, at least, spent time with us....Love and Truth.

Posted by: Barbara at October 11, 2005 10:13 AM

This makes so much sense, as God makes it very clear in Scripture that He uses language and words in a strong way--it's the WORD that's near us, in our heart and our mouth; faith comes from hearing, and hearing from the Word of God; Christ Himself is the Word, etc. and so forth. There's no point, though, in speaking a language someone can't understand. I mean, look at Pentecost--God builds up the church by giving the apostles the ability to be understood by *everyone* present.

Posted by: Manders at October 11, 2005 2:48 PM

Lately I've become convinced that thiss heart and brain dichotomy has no Biblical basis. For starters, it completely ignores the Book of James. I don't believe that the NT authors saw any difference between true faith and practice. If one did not lead to the other, then neither were valid. Both Paul and James would probably scratch their heads in bewilderment if we presented them with this issue, not out of confusion, but because it would never have occurrd to them that two could be split. The whole issue is dealt with in great detail in Habits of the Mind, by James Sire. It is a book well worth reading.

Posted by: Aaron at October 21, 2005 7:37 AM

If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

About

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.