« Holistic righteousness | Main | For Your Consideration »

The Chautauqua ideal

chau tau’ qua (sha-tokwa), n. [from the summer schools inaugurated at Chautauqua, New York, in 1874.] an assembly lasting several days, for educational and recreational purposes: the program includes lectures, concerts, etc.


I have barely had access to a computer lately due to an opportunity to stay on the grounds of Chautauqua Institution, where I play trumpet part-time with the Chautauqua Symphony. Work with the symphony has been especially heavy, but it’s great work.

Chautauqua Institution began 132 years ago as a summer camp for Methodist Sunday-school teachers but has since expanded greatly and spawned many other, smaller chautauquas around the country. The "Chautauqua Ideal” is based on a belief that knowledge and exploration of all kinds should be as available as possible to as many people as possible, for the improvement of humankind. Chautauqua, as it is called for short, gets its name from the lake it is situated upon. No one knows for sure the original meaning of the word, but popular local opinion has it as Indian for “bag tied in the middle.” (That’s because the lake looks like this.)

Chautauqua has become a force in the world, as it offers platform to many distinguished speakers including past presidents and other persons of high position in major organizations. Recent speakers have included Sandra Day O’Connor, Jane Goodall, the Rev. Jesse Jackson, Ken Starr, Tom Ridge, and, this year, Jim Wallis. Week four of this year’s nine-week season is just beginning, and I was really hoping to get to some of the lectures this season but have been so busy with the symphony and everything else that I’ve gotten to one, count ‘em, one, lecture so far. That was with my three-year-old daughter along, so I missed a bit of it. But it was quite interesting, and I will speak more of it later.

Two of Chautauqua’s founding values are religion and knowledge -- admirable values indeed -- yet I fear that the pursuit of knowledge and expression at Chautauqua overshadows everything else, and tolerance masquerades as true piety. Knowledge is mistaken for truth, in a utopian sort of way, and reconciliation is sought where none can be found (religiously speaking). Though world peace as a major goal isn't so bad, it’s the means I wonder about...

A recent movement at Chautauqua is the Abrahamic Initiative, which seeks to find common ground among the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. While this is a noble and worthy goal, the assumption both spoken and unspoken is that all three are equally worthy of respect, which translates into them being equally valid and true. I am all for respect, and for the finding of common ground, yet I object to Christianity being considered as merely a religion or a “faith,” as something less than Truth. The fact that Christianity may be regarded as possessor of the Truth lends to its being viewed as exclusivist, which is a misunderstanding, of course. Yet we are, after all, in the 21st century, and pluralism has gained considerable ground.

Nevertheless, there is much of a deeply interesting, challenging, thought-provoking, and constructive nature going on with the Abrahamic Initiative and at Chautauqua in general this summer and every summer. (There are significant off-season activities as well.) Chautauqua is really a blogger’s paradise! (If only this blogger could partake substantially...ah well; family, work, other responsibilities... and then blogging...*sigh*...)

When I next can get precious computer time (maybe tomorrow??) I will comment on the lecture I heard by the Rev. Oliver Thomas, a Baptist minister, lawyer, author, and educator.

Comments

Sounds interesting. Blog benefit: learning about things going on in other places. Getting to hear about them through a like minded person is a bonus.

Play well. :)

Posted by: Lexie at July 17, 2005 11:15 PM

I read about this place in church history. I guess it was part of the Sunday school movement. Did D.L. Moody speak there?

The Abrahamic initiative sounds interesting but not very hopeful. Technically, doesn't Islam make just as exclusive claims to truth as Christianity does? I suppose it depends on which Muslim you speak to. From what I understand of Judaism, it ranges from the extremely liberal to the extremely conservative. I wonder which section they will be finding common ground with.

Posted by: Hannah Im at July 18, 2005 4:58 AM

Islam does claim exclusivity, and though I've not looked into it for myself, every good apologist I've read notes that the Islamic God is ultimately unknowable (as in, the logical conclusions of some parts of the Koran make it that way). Anybody know where exactly this criticism comes from?

Posted by: Laura at July 18, 2005 5:04 AM

Interesting. Our Midway Village here in Rockford, Illinois, recently held a Chautauqua weekend, mirroring the original Chautauquas. I did an interview with a folk singer/composer/storyteller named Mark Dvorak who performs at such events.
I had heard of Chautauqua before, but wasn't really familiar with its principles.

Posted by: Cindy Swanson at July 18, 2005 6:57 AM

Bonnie - You are very generous and patient in your comments. I took a class "Waging Peace" at the Univ. of Ore. honor's college and it was the most tedious, tiresome class I have ever had to sit through, for the reason you stated - trying to find common ground where there is none. I suppose that if there is a specific and limited purpose, like finding common ground in order to combat poverty or oppose terrorists, then it might be productive, since you don't have to agree on major theistic issues, just on a few major ethical ones. However, as a Christian, if I am going to do social work, I want the freedom to share the gospel as Truth.

Laura - it has been years since my Islam class, but I believe that Allah is seen as very "other" and hence largely unknowable (though obviously somewhat because the Koran is full of info about him and how he wants muslims to live). He is far less personal than God as revealed in Christ, more of the deistic kind of God. That is why the mosques and islamic art don't have pictures, just geometrics, because it is offensive to Allah to try and depict what is transcendant with earthly images.

Posted by: Annie at July 18, 2005 9:51 AM

Well, looking at the page on the Abrahamic Program and doing a few Googles, I get the distinct feeling that the main people involved may not be very interested in the truth-claims of any particular religion.

Karen Armstrong....well, my blood pressure says, let's not go there today. (Ditto Joan Chittister.) Joan Brown Campbell appears to be a liberal ecumenical minister. Rabbi Samuel Stahl is Reform and Rabbi David Hartman founded a "pluralist" Jewish centre (e.g. "In a climate where Jews do not feel claimed by the authority of Torah and Halakhah, the most natural framework for religious expression is selective experimentation rather than unconditional commitment to the authority of Halakhah.") Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf - I don't know enough about Islam to get a quick feel for his position, but he seems to be a Sufi. I understand Sufism is considered heterodox by many Mohammedans, and given that short articles about it on the web say things like "Sufis believe that their teachings are the essence of every religion, and indeed of the evolution of humanity as a whole", they might have a point. Dr. Azim Nanji is director of the Institute of Ismaili Studies - the Ismailis are "a branch of Shiism that follows a living imam and is noted for esoteric philosophy...it incorporated elements of Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, and Hindu thought to explain its concept of the imam. Over time it came to stress the importance of the esoteric aspects of the faith over the exoteric."

So my snap judgment is that it sounds like a bunch of the most esoteric and/or heterodox 'representatives' of their respective traditions are getting together to say nice things to and about each other. There are worse things in the world, but does this really serve the Good and the Truth?

Posted by: Atlantic at July 18, 2005 10:46 AM

Atlantic, Thanks for your research. That is what I suspected. "Liberal" Muslims, Jews, and Christians may well have some common ground, if they all embrace relativism.

I do know Muslims (conservative Shias) and they would view Sufism as heterodox. I've heard that the Ismailis are persecuted in Pakistan by other Muslims who consider them to be heretical.

Posted by: Hannah Im at July 18, 2005 4:30 PM

Thanks for your comments, all.

Atlantic, your snap judgment isn't too far off ;-). From what I've read and observed, I think it's accurate to say that pluralism is a Chautauqua ideal. As I mentioned in the post and in a post on my other blog, world peace and social justice are core Chautauqua goals, with religion and knowledge seen as means to those goals. So naturally people are looking for ways to hold on to their traditional "faiths" yet still find a way to be agreeable so that no one gets mad at anyone else or is incited to do something violent.

The positive things I see happening in these efforts are that people of influence in widely divergent backgrounds are talking to one another, which leads to an increase in understanding. That in itself can never not be a good thing. For people to figure out ways to work together and find practical solutions for helping the oppressed is a good thing too.

Will this lead to world peace? Well, um, no. (But don't tell them I said that ;-) ) Will it lead to better understanding of Truth? Perhaps, in a limited way, if it causes people to respect one another as fellow creations of God.

But, ultimately, people need to be open to the real Truth, via the Holy Spirit, and we need to pray, pray, pray, as Dr. Alveda King (niece of Dr. Martin Luther King) said last night in a talk at Chautauqua.

Atlantic, as for being open to truth-claims, what the people you are referring to are doing is reinventing the truth-claims according to modern progressive "scholarship." (A la' Bishop Spong and others, who have also spoken at Chautauqua recently. ) Their claim is that our dumb forefathers (and -mothers) have gotten it all wrong, and it is up to us enlightened, progressive moderns to try to enlighten everyone else and bring them up to speed. Again, their ultimate hope is not in the true God, but in human wisdom and understanding, and a pipe-dream of world peace.

Posted by: Bonnie at July 19, 2005 11:02 AM

Thanks for the update.

Posted by: Lexie at July 19, 2005 1:21 PM

Interestingly enough, this same topic came up at BHT in a post from a British fellow commenting on the recent bombers coming right from England. He discusses the dangers of allowing liberal representatives of the religions to do all the "peace" talking. Here is the link

http://www.boarsheadtavern.com/archives/2005/07/19/10030939.html

Posted by: Annie at July 19, 2005 2:28 PM

Haven't thought of that. Good case for being involved.

Posted by: Lexie at July 19, 2005 4:47 PM

Annie, thanks for the link! I will certainly follow up on that.

There was a Muslim scholar from London named Zaki Badawi scheduled to speak at Chautauqua last week but he was denied entry to the U. S.!! The American embassy has profusely apologized, however, and offered him free flight to the US. He will be taking part in an off-season Chautauqua event in London in the fall.

Lexie, I ought to add the caveat that, while I'm callin' 'em as I see 'em, I do want to represent what's going on at Chatuauqua fairly, and I hope I am doing that!

Posted by: Bonnie at July 19, 2005 6:54 PM

If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

About

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.