« I Agree....Mostly | Main | Thinking Through Life »

Why am I a Christian and not a _______?

Well, it seems that I’m the Intellectuelle who breaks away from the C.S. Lewis tradition! My involvement in apologetics began after I was married and had my 3 kids, but before I began my educational pursuits. When pregnant with my 3rd son, I found myself in a crisis of faith. The fundamental question for me was “Why am I a Christian and not a _______?” You can fill in the blank with Buddhist, Hindu, Atheist, or anything else. I just wanted to know why, but at a more foundational level -- and I didn’t start with any light reading either! I dove into books like J.P. Moreland’s “Love Your God with All Your Mind” and Norman Geisler’s “Christian Apologetics.” I spent a couple of years trying to figure out how I was going to teach other Christians how to make, for example, the cosmological argument for the existence of God. Enter Cornelius Van Til.

In an AOL chat room I met someone who challenged my preferred apologetic method by asking me some very basic questions about how I know God, how I know something to be true, and why I was engaging non-Christians in a way that assumed the possibility of neutrality – an objective place where the Christian and the non-Christian could “meet” – as if on the basis of the unbeliever’s worldview s/he could arrive at a content-full knowledge to God. This was my introduction to the presuppositional apologetic method of Cornelius Van Til, Greg Bahnsen, Francis Schaeffer, John Frame, et al. as well as the field of epistemology.

Over the years I’ve lost track of the timeline of these events, but it was my deep passion to understand my faith and desire to communicate it to others that inspired me to go to college in 1998. At the age of 28, and with my youngest of 3 children being only 4 months old, I began my bachelor’s program at Trinity International University and graduated in 2002 with a b.a. in Christian Ministry. Two weeks later I entered seminary. May 14th of this year I graduated with a master’s degree in Christian Thought with an emphasis in systematic theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. My thesis was essentially an integration of theology/apologetics and ethics and is titled “H. Tristram Engelhardt on Christian Participation in the Public Square: A Van Tilian Philosophical Critique.” I’ll probably continue in my education, perhaps working towards doctoral work in ethics and/or theology. Currently, I’m on staff at The Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity and promote apologetics and worldview thinking to women through The Foundation for Women of Faith in Culture.

So today, my mission from God (I watch the Blues Brothers way too often) is to help people see how the “bits and pieces” approach to faith and living is insufficient, that we need to live out our faith in a way that acknowledges God’s sovereignty in all areas of life. I want people to understand that everyone has presuppositions, Christians have them and secularists do, too. To suggest that only Christians have a bias is just plain insanity.

Finally, I just want to say what a privilege it is to be part of the Intellectuelles. I look forward to the dialogue we will have with each other and with our readers. This is going to be an incredible time of growth for each of us and I’m excited about engaging in the blogosphere. And another thanks to Joe Carter for his support of this project!!!

***DISCLAIMER*** Anything I post on this blog does not represent the views of The Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity, they are my own. But they will wish they were theirs!!!

Comments

Very interesting, Sarah! I am just getting into presuppositional apologetics now, and I can't wait to learn more about it from you.

Posted by: Laura at June 30, 2005 7:31 AM

Thanks for exposing me to new authors, including the someone from the AOL chatroom.

Something exciting about this blog is the intersection of lives that otherwise wouldn't have happened. I don't get a chance to hang out on college campuses often, so I wouldn't have met Laura. As for the The Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity...suffice it to say it's not in my travel plans. Well, it wasn't. Ya never know.

I'm thrilled to be sandwiched between someone just getting into pre·suppo·sition·al (read slowly to get pronunciation right) apologetics and someone who has master’s degree in Christian Thought with an emphasis in systematic theology. Oh, my.

This will be fun.

Posted by: Lexie at June 30, 2005 8:42 AM

Despite my "Why Apologetics" entry, I still waver between presuppositional and classical apologetics.

Posted by: Samantha at June 30, 2005 8:43 AM

This is probably worthy of a post on it's own....what's the difference between presuppositional and classical apologetics?

BTW, I'm asking for all the readers out there who want to know but are afraid to ask. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Posted by: Lexie at June 30, 2005 8:46 AM

Lexie, you read my mind! I don't know what they mean either but I'm guessing presuppositional "assumes" certain things, perhaps the existence of God? And classical is more like C.S. Lewis who takes it from square one. Curious to hear what our more knowledgeable (in this area) counterparts have to say about it...

Sarah, it's good to getting to know you, and I look forward to more. What a blessing to have someone with your credentials/education (who is so down-to-earth) on our team!

Posted by: Marla at June 30, 2005 9:09 AM

Am I allowed to comment on my own blog? LOL A lot of what I think/write about has to do with epistemology so you'll see more from me on apologetic methodology in the future. In the meantime, check out Cowan's "Five Views of Apologetics" published by Zondervan.

Posted by: Sarah at June 30, 2005 9:15 AM

Good post Sarah. Look forward to hearing from you and the other ladies. For those interested in presuppositional apologetics might want to check here and listen to Michael Butler's lectures titled "Evangelism and Apologetics Conference."

Also, you'll forgive me for this shameless plug for the Countercult Apologetics Journal I'm working on.

If anyone is interested in contributing a book or article review for the Jan. 06 edition, please Email me. The material under review would need to cult and/or world religion focused.

I'd take reviews of older books and/or newer ones. Contact me with any questions.

PS. For those wanting to know the difference in apologetic methodologies (e.g. Evidential and Presupp.) you might want to listen to the first audio program listed on the page I mention above.

Posted by: Jeff Downs at June 30, 2005 9:17 AM

Good comments as usual Sarah ;) I thought that I would encourage people to look into the book Faith Has It's Reasons by Boa and Bowman. It gives a fair overview of the various apologetical methods and their differences. Keith, the one from AOL who persuaded Sarah to read and consider Van Til, has also been known to recommend the Boa and Bowman book :-) Their approach is rather eclectic.

One can also download useful audio lectures by Greg Bahnsen from www.WordMP3.com He gives a fair lecture on the differences between Van Til and Gordon Clark. They were both presuppositionalists, but had significant epistemological differences. Bahnsen also deals with Kuyper and Warfield. These lectures by Bahnsen are well worth listening to.

Posted by: YnottonY at June 30, 2005 1:09 PM

Sarah - You said that you went to school while your children were still young. Would you consider posting about that? I never actually planned to leave college . . . :-) but I have a hard time imagining how I would fit motherhood and school together.

Posted by: Annie at June 30, 2005 1:40 PM

Hmm . . . my (very limited!) understanding was the presup. doesn't try to prove God's existance - since everybody knows that there is a God - and focuses more on why the Christian worldview is the only one that makes sense out of things; whereas evidentialist starts with trying to prove that there is a God (pointing out the "evidence" for God). But then again, I've yet to actually finish any apologetics book that I've started, and I thought Schaeffer was evidentialist, so, I'm not really sure! :-)

Posted by: JH at June 30, 2005 3:18 PM

Very impressive, Sarah! As someone who has taken a more organic and practical approach to apologetics (yeah, I'm not quite sure what I mean either ;-) ), I am looking forward to what I will learn from you and the other learned ones on this team!

Glad to meet you!

Posted by: Bonnie at June 30, 2005 8:14 PM

If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.

About

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.