1. YouTube University: YouTube has struck deals with major universities, creating dedicated channels from which schools can distribute their media content. Check out the channels for UC Berkeley and University of Southern California.
4. Top Twenty Theological Pick-up Lines NOT to use:
#19. "Looking at you makes me reconsider preterism, because you are heaven on earth."
#14. "Your name must be grace, because you are irresistible."
5. Ronald Cherry on Judeo-Christian Values:
Our Founding Fathers separated church from state, but they wisely did not separate God from state; they acknowledged God as the source of our rights, and, in fact, they were careful to place Biblical morality directly into our founding documents and laws, and into our values and culture precisely to help prevent a future of totalitarian or tyrannical rule in America. The combination of keeping Judeo-Christian religious morality in the state, as opposed to the church it's self; and, additionally, setting up our laws based on reason and common sense has contributed to the American Character, and to what is known as "American Exceptionalism."
(HT: Maggie's Farm)
6. Quote of the Week: "There's a huge overlap between environmental stewardship and economic stewardship. When you think about it, God created the world so that we depend on it for our material existence. That includes the natural environment and all the stuff that we build from the natural environment. He allows us to make a living from it, and when we take care of it well, we prosper." -- Rusty Pritchard, the national director of outreach for the Evangelical Environmental Network. (HT: The Evangelical Ecologist)
7. According to a FOX News Poll, 19 percent of Democrats and 5 percent of Republicans polled believe the world will be better off if America loses the war in Iraq. (HT: HolyCoast)
8. From the abstract of a paper on Prescription Drug Coverage and Elderly Medicare Spending: "Overall, a $1 increase in prescription drug spending is associated with a $2.06 reduction in Medicare spending." (HT: Marginal Revolution)
9. How To Clean Your House In Under 20 Minutes
10. Robert Nozick on beliefs and knockdown arguments:
The penalty philosophers wield is, after all, rather weak. If the other person is willing to bear the label of “irrational” or “having the worse arguments”, he can skip away happily maintaining his previous belief. He will be trailed, of course, by the philosopher furiously hurling philosophical imprecations: “What do you mean, you’re willing to be irrational? You shouldn’t be irrational because . . . ” And although the philosopher is embarrassed by his inability to complete this sentence in a noncircular fashion–he can only produce reasons for accepting reasons–still, he is unwilling to let his adversary go.
Wouldn’t it be better if philosophical arguments left the person no possible answer at all, reducing him to impotent silence? Even then, he might sit there silently, smiling, Buddha-like. Perhaps philosophers need arguments so powerful they set up reverberations in the brain: if the person refuses to accept the conclusion, he dies. How’s that for a powerful argument? Yet, as with other physical threats (”your money or your life”), he can choose defiance. A “perfect” philosophical argument would leave no choice.
(HT: orgtheory.net)
11. Website Grader, a free tool that measures the marketing effectiveness of a website. It provides a score that incorporates things like website traffic, SEO, social popularity and other technical factors.
12. Jimmy Carter says that the atrocities in Darfur shouldn’t be called "genocide":
There is a legal definition of genocide and Darfur does not meet that legal standard. The atrocities were horrible but I don't think it qualifies to be called genocide.
Can it really be true that this clown was once our President? (HT: RedState)
13. Megan of From the Archives on governments and choice:
This is the other thing I don't get about small government types. You protest so vociferously that government takes choices away from you. But a whole lot of choices are BORING. If I never once think about car bumper safety standards for 25mph crashes, I will never miss it. I do not want to carefully match my car safety standards to my most likely driving patterns and save two grand in the process. I would not enjoy that process. (Perhaps you would, and you would rather have the money.) I've never been a comparison shopper or a meticulous consumer. Maybe my model of the individual is too biased by my experience. But I don't want to figure out how much coliform bacteria I can tolerate on my spinach, given my health…
…*I can hear you already: "But you are FORCING me to take that deal too.". Yes. But right now our system FORCES me to comparison shop. Either way, someone gets FORCED to do something, and I don't see a justice interest on one side or the other. Absent a justice interest, we might as well just go with the system that creates the most utility overall.
(HT: Marginal Revolution)
14. God Don't Make No Junk: Scientists may have found appendix’s purpose
15. Steve Wasserman on the decline of book reviewing in America:
[W]ithout books, indeed, without the news of such books—without literacy—the good society vanishes and barbarism triumphs. I shall never forget overhearing some years ago, on the morning of the first day of the annual Los Angeles Times Festival of Books, a woman asking a UCLA police officer if he expected trouble. He looked at her with surprise and said, "Ma'am, books are like Kryptonite to gangs." There was more wisdom in that cop's remark than in a thousand academic monographs on reforming the criminal justice system. What he knew, of course, is what all societies since time immemorial have known: If you want to reduce crime, teach your children to read. Civilization is built on a foundation of books.
(HT: The Buck Stops Here)
16. Shades of Anti-Semitism? -- Richard Dawkins on the power of the Jews:
When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told - religious Jews anyway - than atheists and [yet they] more or less monopolise American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place.
(HT: Vox Popoli)
17. Picture of the Week: The World is the name of a group pf about 300 manmade islands off the coast of Dubai designed for luxury living. There are planned communities, full utillities, and beachfronts for everyone. Seen from the sky, the groups of islands look like a map of the world

(HT: Neatorama)
18. How to reboot your brain with a "caffeine nap":
Scientists say that a successful midday nap depends on two things: timing and (no kidding) caffeine consumption. Experiments performed at Loughborough University in the UK showed that the sleep-deprived need only a cup of coffee and 15 minutes of shut-eye to feel amazingly refreshed.
1. Right before you crash, down a cup of java. The caffeine has to travel through your gastro-intestinal tract, giving you time to nap before it kicks in.
2. Close your eyes and relax. Even if you only doze, you'll get what's known as effective microsleep, or momentary lapses of wakefulness.
3. Limit your nap to 15 minutes. A half hour can lead to sleep inertia, or the spinning down of the brain's prefrontal cortex, which handles functions like judgment. This gray matter can take 30 minutes to reboot.
(HT: Lifehacker)
20. Paramount Pictures has released the trailer for one of the most anticipated movies (at least anticipated by me) of 2008: Iron Man.
21. Spouses often mirror each other's health habits -- If one spouse exercises, quits smoking, stops drinking alcohol, receives a flu shot, or undergoes a cholesterol screening, the other spouse is more likely to do the same, according to a new study in Health Services Research.
22. From the opening paragraph of Justise Clarence Thomas's book "My Grandfather's Son":
I was nine years old when I met my father. His name was M.C. Thomas, and my birth certificate describes him as a "laborer." My mother divorced him in 1950 and he moved north to Philadelphia, leaving his family behind in Pinpoint, the tiny Georgia community where I was born. I saw him only twice when I was young. The first time was when my mother called her parents, with whom my brother Myers and I then lived, and told them that someone at her place wanted to see us. They called a cab and sent us to her housing-project apartment, where my father was waiting. "I am your daddy," he told us in a firm, shameless voice that carried no hint of remorse for his inexplicable absence from our lives. He said nothing about loving or missing us, and we didn't say much in return -- it was as though we were meeting a total stranger -- but he treated us politely enough, and even promised to send us a pair of Elgin watches with flexible bands, which were popular at the time. Though we watched the mail every day, the watches never came, and when a year or so had gone by, my grandparents bought them for us instead. My father had broken the only promise he ever made to us. After that we heard nothing more from him, not even a Christmas or birthday card. For years my brother and I would ask ourselves how a man could show no interest in his own children. I still wonder.
(HT: CrunchyCon)
23. How To Explore Internet Memes (HT: The Presurfer)
24. Even without math, ancients engineered sophisticated machines -- A researcher at Harvard University is finding that ancient Greek craftsmen were able to engineer sophisticated machines without necessarily understanding the mathematical theory behind their construction. Recent analysis of technical treatises and literary sources dating back to the fifth century B.C. reveals that technology flourished among practitioners with limited theoretical knowledge.
5. LOLCat of the Week

26. Obama the monarchist (Part I) -- Speaking at an evangelical church on Sunday, Barack Obama said,
I just want all of you to pray that I can be an instrument of God in the same way that Pastor Ron and all of you are instruments of God….We're going to keep on praising together. I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth.
27. Obama the monarchist (Part II) -- Jared Bridges responds,
Like his predecessor Howard Dean before him, Sen. Obama must have been reading from the DNC’s pamphlet “How to Speak Like an Evangelical.” Trouble is, whoever wrote the Democrats’ book on evangelicaspeak probably did their research by watching Hollywood movies or bad TBN reruns (it’s hard to say!). It’s waaay off.
Obama has apparently come under the same delusion that befell some of Jesus’ disciples. The thought that “the Kingdom” was something that could be ushered along through political means left them dumfounded at the cross.
28. The #1 Song On This Date In History (HT: The Presurfer)
29. Lesser of two evils: When do we prefer to get rid of things? -- The theory of loss aversion is used in many contexts to explain why potential loss has a greater mitigating influence on behavior than potential gain. In trading situations, consumers will most likely opt to keep what they have, tending to place a larger value on the items already in their possession (also known as the 'endowment effect'). However, these theories generally assume that consumers like what they have enough to want to keep it. What happens when we're in possession of something we hate"
30. Secret Recipes (HT: The Presurfer)
31. Why Emotionally Charged Events Are So Memorable -- The parts of the brain where memories are stored need to distinguish between significant experiences and those that carry less importance, giving priority to the transformation of the former into long-term memory, the researchers explained. One factor that scientists believe to be critical in that process is the emotional load of an event. Indeed, studies have shown that heightened states of emotion can facilitate learning and memory.
32. Negativity Is Contagious, Study Finds -- An new study in the Journal of Consumer Research reveals that negative opinions cause the greatest attitude shifts, not just from good to bad, but also from bad to worse.
33. Dove Onslaught

10 tabs out of 33 articles. Not bad, Mr. Carter.
Blogging a conference.....nmmmmmmmmm.....I wonder if that includes the recommendation to locate a power outlet....cuz my battery died!!!
Jimmy Carter says that the atrocities in Darfur shouldn’t be called "genocide":
Can it really be true that this clown was once our President?
He is probably correct legally. At least he is over there trying to speak out against the atrocities. It is time to remind ourselves of Joe's relationship to Darfur & politics.
A long time ago Joe posted an entry about the value of being pro-life. I recall he asserted that someone who is pro-life on abortion, stem cells etc. will be more likely to stand up to atrocities in Darfur (Joe was concentrating that post on Rudy and whether a pro-choicer would have a good foreign policy).
At the time I tried searching the thousands of posts Joe has made on this blog and found next to nothing posted on Darfur. In other words, being pro-life seems to enable someone to do just as good a job ignoring atrocities in Darfur as being pro-choice. (This seems to apply to the larger political realm as well, pro-life positions has not handicapped politicians in being able to ignore Darfur as well as pro-choice politicians ignore Darfur...I guess we can call it bi-partisanship).
It's nice to see Joe has continued this winning streak of indifference. The only thing he seems capable of saying about Darfur is taking cheap swipes at Jimmy Carter because...well...Jimmy Carter is always fair game no matter what.
Boonton:
You know, it's a bit hypocritical for you to criticize Joe for taking a swipe at Jimmy Carter, when you seem (almost) always willing to take a cheap shot at Joe.
Joe:
The first part of Boonton's criticism is, in my opinion, correct. Carter wasn't saying that there were no atrocities in Darfur. He wasn't saying that everything there was fine. He was saying that what was happening there didn't meet the definition of genocide.
It's kind of like when we protest against using laws against terrorism to go after drug dealers. Yes, drug dealing is wrong/illegal. Yes, the authorities should go after it. But labeling it terrorism just dilutes the defintion of terrorism.
Same thing here. Genocide doesn't just mean "something bad that we don't like". It means something specific. It doesn't mean civil war. It doesn't even mean civil war with atrocities.
Jimmy Carter also has the virtue of actually having been to Darfur, having investigated the situation, having seen for himself. The potshot at him seems quite unwaranted.
RE Ronald Cherry on Judeo-Christian Values.
American Exceptionalism is not a good thing. It is a perversion of Judeo-Christian values-it has more to do with so-called "civil religion" than the gospel of Jesus Christ. American Exceptionalism is an arrogant belief that America is a special nation chosen by God and therefore can do no wrong. Not a good thing. Pride cometh before a fall.
"10 tabs out of 33 articles. Not bad, Mr. Carter."
I like this rating system for 33 Things posts, although for me Joe only scored 8/33 I still found it enjoyable.
The first part of Boonton's criticism is, in my opinion, correct. Carter wasn't saying that there were no atrocities in Darfur. He wasn't saying that everything there was fine. He was saying that what was happening there didn't meet the definition of genocide.
Yes, and I'm saying that Carter is wrong, the situation in Darfur does meet the legal criteria for genocide. According to the legal definition of the term in Article 2 of the 1948 U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, genocide includes "deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part."
This is occurring in Darfur and this is why calling it "genocide" is not only applicable morally, but legally as well.
Also, Carter's refusal to call it genocide puts him at odds with John Kerry, Joe Liebermann, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the entire U.S. Congress, and the International Association of Genocide Scholars. Are we really saying that Carter knows more than they do?
The reason he disagrees with them is because he is an apologist for the UN -- a group that has so far refused to call the genocide in Darfur a genocide.
Jimmy Carter also has the virtue of actually having been to Darfur, having investigated the situation, having seen for himself. The potshot at him seems quite unwaranted.
The fact that he has been there and investigated the situation himself and still refuses to acknowledge the genocide shows that he as incompetent out of office as he was as President.
Am I being harsh? Yes, a bit. But Carter is a patsy who has a history of excusing or downplaying the actions of groups who commit atrocities.
Regarding #7:
Leave it up to FoxNews to frame a question like they did in a poll. First of all, the war in Iraq is not a War it is an occupation against insurgents that want us off their land. Secondly, the Dems and many other groups want out of Iraq because they realize that this "war" is winless and they care for our troops and the innocent Iraqi lives that are effected by this tragedy. Another reason why I will never watch FoxNews again.......
"Megan of From the Archives" just became the new poster child for paternalistic government (and I do mean "child"). Freedom comes with responsibility and Megan has spoken... she doesn't want the responsibility.
Actually, Megan is not alone, although most people frame it as a freedom vs. security issue rather than the childish freedom vs. responsibility of Megan (not that she understands this). That's America in 2007...it seems more common than not that people in the "land of the free and home of the brave" would, as Benjamin Franklin said, give up freedom to gain a little security. Perhaps Megan will find out one day when she has neither what old Ben said about that...i.e. people like her deserve neither.
#16,
I am so tired an any an every comment about the Jewish race, Zionism or the state of Israel as anti Semitism. Are we not allowed to point out the bad deeds that some on the jewish community have brought forth without it being AntiSemitic. Why is that? We can do it with any other faction, we can but we can't with the Jews? There is no good, no not one. We need to stop looking at the Jews as some sort of super race ammune to any critism. I am not antisemtic, I am also not anti islamic or anti black or anti redhead or anything. We were all created in God's image and we need not shy away from calling evil what it is, even if it might come from the Jewish community. I don't have a lot to say about Dawkins but I can see what he is saying and it is NOT AntiSemitic.
Also, Carter's refusal to call it genocide puts him at odds with John Kerry, Joe Liebermann, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the entire U.S. Congress, and the International Association of Genocide Scholars. Are we really saying that Carter knows more than they do?
If the UN gets to define the term, Joe, then you have to recognize a UN appointed commission also determined Darfur did not mee the definition. Likewise many European gov'ts also have not found it meets the legal definition. Yes American politicians running for office who have an incentive to pay lip service to the horrible situation rather than demand real action differ. This isn't the first time an issue like this has come up. The Anti-Defamation League was criticized because they didn't believe the Armenian Genocide fits the definition either. I wouldn't say that they are clowns because of that position (and of course, like Carter, they do not accept Turkey's long running position that nothing bad happened to the Armenians).
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#Darfur
So no I'm not going to say Carter is right in his legal position, only that it doesn't appear to be clownish and he does not stand alone in it. More to the point, of all the things to say about Darfur this, IMO, is probably the least important issue. Carter, along with the other 'Elders', actually went there collected the testimony of the victims and brought their grievances to the public stage. While that alone will not change much it is a lot more than many other people have done or even thought about doing. It seems to me to have been a better use of the limited time Darfur gets in this blog to attempt to expand on that good rather than taking yet another tired shot at Carter's lackluster Presidency that ended over 20 years ago.
Mike
You know, it's a bit hypocritical for you to criticize Joe for taking a swipe at Jimmy Carter, when you seem (almost) always willing to take a cheap shot at Joe.
On the contrary, my shots at Joe are always premium.
The point about books was insightful. Reading, it seems to me, even books of various levels of sophistication, creates empathy, don't you think? And one thing about criminals is, they seem to have little to no empathy.
J.J. is right. Megan is childish, though I would call here worse.
In #13, Megan writes:
"Either way, someone gets FORCED to do something, and I don't see a justice interest on one side or the other. Absent a justice interest, we might as well just go with the system that creates the most utility overall."
Joe, here is why such thinking is fatally flawed: When there is no justice interest involved, then it is utterly outside the competence of civil government.
This is why Megan doesn't "get" small government types. I hope you get it, Joe. I hope you realize Megan is dead, dead wrong in her supposed "utility" conclusion.
I had hope you affirmed societal sphere sovereignty.
Why is it when a Democrat talks about effecting political change for God he's a monarchist, but when a Republican talks about the same thing he's a values voter?