Does the New Hampshire Primary Matter?

Since 1976 there have been five elections with an open Democratic nomination. How reliable has the New Hampshire primary been at predicting the future nominee? Slightly better than the Iowa caucus. But more interestingly, out of five non-incumbent elections, the 1st or 2nd place winner of the primary eventually went on to win the nomination.

--When one of the candidates is the current vice president: 50% accuracy on two elections (predicted Gore but chose Hart over Mondale).

--When the vice-president isn’t running: Two primary winners (Carter and Dukakis) out of three elections won the top slot and eventually became the nominee.

--Overall non-incumbent prediction rate: 3 of 5 (60%)

--Number of times the second place winner won the nomination: 2 of 5 (40%)

--Number of times the winner has been the same as the Iowa caucus winner: 2 of 5 (Carter and Gore)

Here is the primary data since 1976:

1976 (8 candidates)
Caucus winner: Jimmy Carter; Nominee: Jimmy Carter

1980 – Incumbent (Carter)

1984 (6 candidates)
Caucus winner: Gary Hart; Nominee: Walter Mondale

1988 (8 candidates)
Caucus winner: Michael Dukakis; Nominee: Michael Dukakis

1992 (9 candidates)
Caucus winner: Paul Tsongas; Nominee: Bill Clinton

1996 – Incumbent (Clinton)

2000
Caucus winner: Al Gore; Nominee: Al Gore

Update: Josh from BushBlog puts my research to shame. I only went back to '76. He want back to '52! Still, the results were the same, "no candidate who did worse than second has ever won the party's nomination."

Update 2: Southern Appeal found this quote by DNC chairman Terry McAuliffe:

You know, Iowa and New Hampshire, great states -- but really not representative of the Democratic Party. Don't mean it critically, but there really aren't any minorities in those states.

Since the 1st or 2nd place finisher of NH will likely be the eventual nominee, what does this say about the Democrat's commitment to "diversity?" As Mark from SA asks, "Question -- when has the Democrat Party, which was pro-slavery and anti-civil rights, ever done anything to help minorites? "

| January 25, 2004 | | Comments [1] | TrackBacks [5]

5 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry:

Does the New Hampshire Primary Matter?
.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/323

building society from building society on January 16, 2006 2:16 PM

building society building society ht... Read More

beneficial beneficial http://www.fundslender.co.uk/?kw=beneficial Read More

condom allergy from condom allergy on March 26, 2006 3:54 PM

condom allergy Read More

wheat allergy intolerance celiac from wheat allergy intolerance celiac on March 28, 2006 8:21 PM

wheat allergy intolerance celiac Read More

verizon wireless from verizon wireless on April 11, 2006 11:18 AM

verizon wireless Read More

1 Comments

niucons writes:

Joe, that's a little unfair. You know that the D's and the GOP switched sides on race in the 50's and 60's. And there are no minorities to speak of in Iowa and New Hampsire. Terry M. is speaking of changing the primary to Mich, or a more representitive state in 08.


sponsors


blog advertising is good for you

Archives

Categories


Creative Commons License

what they're saying...

Beliefnet

"Best Spiritual Blog"


Dr. John Mark Reynolds

"Joe Carter is Dante for people with attention deficit disorder."


The 2005 Weblog Awards

"Best Religious Blog"


Hugh Hewitt

"Evangelical Outpost has quickly become one of the must reads of the blogosphere, a daily stop for serious people."


featured in...

Washington Post+NPR+The New York Times+BBC World Service+BBC Five Live+World+AP+The Weekly Standard+National Review Online+The Guardian (UK)+The Hugh Hewitt Show+Trouw+Family News in Focus+Salon.com


published articles

The American Spectator
Boundless
National Review Online
WORLD magazine


about me


contact me