1. Chuck Norris Approved
2. Theologian Wayne Grudem's Advice on Interpreting the Word
3. An Online Color Thesaurus (HT: The Presurfer)
4. Jennifer Roback Morse on The Boyfriend Problem:
The bottom line: the most dangerous person in a child's life, the person most likely to abuse a child, is his mother's cohabiting boyfriend. Not the biological father. The opponents of marriage have driven biological married fathers out of the home. Feminists have convinced women that marriage is dangerous to them. The opponents of marriage never seem to take responsibility for the fact that the main alternative to marriage, cohabitation, is much more dangerous to women and their children.
5. Baseball Pitches Illustrated: A fan’s guide to identifying pitches (HT: The Presurfer)
6. Quote of the Week: "Catholic-Protestant ecumenism is like a very odd dinner party where everyone sits around saying polite and edifying things while waiting for the other guest to die." -- The Thomist at Just Thomism (HT: Siris)
7. Does Death Penalty Save Lives?
According to roughly a dozen recent studies, executions save lives. For each inmate put to death, the studies say, 3 to 18 murders are prevented.
The effect is most pronounced, according to some studies, in Texas and other states that execute condemned inmates relatively often and relatively quickly.
(HT: Mirror of Justice)
8. British Nukes Armed with a Bicycle Lock Key
Well into the late 1990's, arming one of Britain's nuclear weapons required no special knowledge, and no special hardware. All that was needed was a single key, like the kind you use to open a bicycle lock.
There are no codes," former nuclear engineer Brian Burnell explains to a BBC reporter, as they stand around a "training version" of a WE.177 nuclear bomb. "You need access to the arming panel, and for that, just a strong fingernail or screwdriver would do.
Once you've opened the panel up, you only need "one key -- rather similar to a bicycle lock key…Turn it 90 degrees to the right, and the bomb's armed."
Thankfully, that's been fixed. But an even-more unnerving fact remains. The BBC alleges that British Trident nuclear submarine skippers can still launch their missiles -- without any code being sent from their commanders. According to the BBC, the Ministry of Defence said that "the safeguards that other countries built in… were not relevant to British submarines."
9. This is just wrong: Flexible Pet Ownership
FLEXPETZ is a shared dog ownership concept that provides our members with access to a variety of FLEXPETZ dogs. All FLEXPETZ dogs complete obedience training and some FLEXPETZ dogs are also certified as therapy dogs.
Through the FLEXPETZ shared dog ownership concept, members can spend from just a few hours to a number of days with each of our dogs. FLEXPETZ dogs are available in varied breed sizes to ensure compatibility with our member's individual lifestyles and unique circumstances.
(HT: The Presurfer)
10. Maggie Gallagher on the Black/White Marriage Gap:
…The American Dream plays a lot better in white than black.
The "marriage gap" between white and black plays a big part in this story. African-Americans are much less likely than their parents were (or than white adults are now) to be married. They are also more likely to have children outside of marriage than their parents were, or than white adults are today.
When 25 percent of children in a community are born outside of marriage (as among whites today) that's a serious problem. When almost 70 percent of children in a given community are born outside of marriage (as among African-Americans today) that's a tsunami blocking the intergenerational accumulation of human and social capital.
So far, the silence about the issue among our leaders is deafening. Hillary, Barack, Fred, Mitt, Rudy: Who will take up the challenge of reducing the marriage gap written so starkly in black and white? Who wants to rebuild the American Dream for all our children?
(HT: Family Scholars Blog)
11. China Spies: "A report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission paints an alarming picture of Chinese espionage as the "greatest threat to US security," constituting an "aggressive and large-scale industrial espionage campaign" against America."
12. From the abstract of the paper, "The Mortality Cost To Smokers" [PDF]
This article estimates the mortality cost of smoking based on the first labor market estimates of the value of statistical life by smoking status. Using these values in conjunction with the increase in the mortality risk over the life cycle due to smoking, the value of statistical life by age and gender, and information on the number of packs smoked over the life cycle, produces an estimate of the private mortality cost of smoking of $222 per pack for men and $94 per pack for women in 2006 dollars, based on a 3 percent discount rate. At discount rates of 15 percent or more, the cost decreases to under $25 per pack.
(HT: Freakonomics)
13. Rich Lowry on progress in Iraq:
Forget the briefings from generals, the intelligence evaluations and the Pentagon status reports. There is a handy indicator for whether the war in Iraq is going well — its relative absence from the front pages.
(HT: Maggie's Farm)
14. Wilfred M. McClay on Why Conservatives Should Care About Cities:
One should, to begin with, set aside the idea that conservatism is at bottom merely a timeless philosophy of landed elites and fixed social structures. For the idea of conservatism, far from being anti-urban, has always been inextricably bound up in the history and experience of great cities. When Russell Kirk wrote his celebrated book The Roots of American Order, he ingeniously built it around the central cities of the history of the West: Athens, Jerusalem, Rome, and London (and arguably also Philadelphia). Each city was taken to exemplify a foundational stage in the development of American liberty and American order. This was not merely a literary conceit, like a metonym. Such developments could only occur in cities. The civilization that conservatives wish to conserve is rooted in them. It is no accident that the Book of Revelation at the conclusion of the Christian Bible aims at the creation of the New Jerusalem, not the New Tara Plantation or the New Grover's Corners.
15. The Lassie Experiment: Will Fido Save You in an Emergency Or Just Let You Die?
16. C. S. Lewis on Torture:
"The identity, or close connection between the Fairies and the dead was certainly believed in, for witches confessed to seeing the dead among the Fairies. Answers to leading questions under torture naturally tell us nothing about the beliefs of the accused; but they are good evidence for the beliefs of the accusers." --The Discarded Image, p. 137
(HT: Dangerous Idea)
17. Picture of the Week: Washington, DC on $85 a Day

Flickr user Musely took this series of photographs lining up the illustration of buildings on the back of US currencies with the actual buildings in Washington, D.C.! Shown are the Lincoln Memorial ($5), the US Treasury ($10), White House ($20), and the Capitol ($50). (HT: Neatorama)
18. Can bloggers be journalists? Federal court says yes -- Journalists aren't defined by a title but by what they produce, and a recent federal ruling allows bloggers who produce journalism to have the same rights and privileges as more traditional news writers.
19. Tom Gilson debunks the Resurrection Fable Fable
20. Good spellers age better than poor spellers
Poor spellers get worse at spelling as they get older, whereas good spellers don't. That's according to Sara Margolin and Lise Abrams who say that being a good speller appears to afford people protection from the detrimental effect that getting older can have on spelling ability.
21. Jean Burgess on Vernacular Creativity:
I used the concept to talk about everyday creative practices like storytelling, family photographing, scrapbooking, journaling and so on that pre-exist the digital age and yet are co-evolving with digital technologies and networks in really interesting ways. So the documentation of everyday life and the public sharing of that documentation, as in sharing photos on Flickr, or autobiographical blogging; these are forms of vernacular creativity, remediated in digital contexts. These are also cultural practices that perhaps we don't normally think of as creative, because we've become so used to thinking of creativity as a special property of genius-like individuals, rather than as a general human -- some would say -- evolutionary process. I found the term really useful for focusing on the fact that there is much about the current explosion of amateur content creation online that has a long history, that isn¹t particularly revolutionary, and that relates to specific local contexts and identities. Vernacular creativity is ordinary.
But ordinary doesn't mean generic or boring, not necessarily anyway. Each example of vernacular creativity is also a representation of a specific life, a specific time, a specific place. Because of this specificity, the ordinariness of vernacular creativity doesn't necessarily equate to uninterestingness. The practices and artifacts of vernacular creativity are of course very rich and meaningful in relation to the social contexts in which they're created, communicated, and disseminated: think of your own family photo album, and then a complete stranger's family photo album from the 1960s that you stumble across in the back of a junk shop in a different country, for example. Both ordinary at the point of origin, both full of meanings and stories, but in different ways. The point is, culture doesn¹t have to be sublime or spectacular to be useful or significant or interesting to someone, somewhere.
22. Going Fishing? Catch-and-release In Less Than Four Minutes, Please
Recreational fishing that involves catch-and-release may seem like just good fun, and that released fish go on to live happily ever after, but a recent study shows that improper handling techniques by anglers can increase the likelihood of released fish being caught by predators. After the stress of the catch and lack of oxygen from being out of water, the fish is in a weakened state.
23. Economist Tyler Cowen on the future of the music business:
In the past most people didn't much like or listen to most of the music they bought, or in any case most of the value came from their very favorites. A relatively small percentage of our music purchases accounted for most of our listening pleasure. So if people can sample music in advance, and know in advance what they will like, music sales will plummet. This will be a sign of market efficiency, not market failure.
Admittedly copyright issues are being superimposed on this scenario at the same time, so the net assessment of current music trends is complex. But when there is uncertainty about consumer tastes, falling output can be a strong Pareto improvement. (It's just like how having lots of dates is not necessarily the sign of a happy love life.) Less music is being produced, but we're getting more of the stuff we want.
24. Most adults who attended religious services as a child are glad they did
Study results released from Ellison Research (Phoenix, Arizona) show that only 7% of all American adults have not had any point in their lives when they regularly attended religious worship services (attendance of once a month or more).
Just over half of all adults (51%) say they currently attend religious worship services of some kind once a month or more, leaving 42% who can be considered “lapsed” – meaning they attended regularly at some point, but no longer do so.
Most of this previous attendance was during childhood. Nine out of ten adults attended religious worship services regularly at some point before the age of 18, including 86% of those who no longer attend today.
25. LOLCat of the Week

moar funny pictures
26. Richard John Neuhaus's opening statement in a debate on the separation of religion and politics:
I speak in favor of the separation of church and state, and therefore against the resolution that religion and politics should always be kept separate. Permit me to explain. To enforce the exclusion of religion from politics, or from public life more generally, violates the First Amendment guarantee of the “free exercise of religion.” The free exercise of religion is the reason for the separation of church and state—a principle that aims not at protecting the state from religion but at protecting religion from the state.
In the First Amendment, religious freedom is of a piece with, indeed is in the very same sentence with, free speech, free press, free assembly, and the right to challenge government policy. Hence the resolution put before this house flatly contradicts the guarantees of a free and democratic society enshrined in the Constitution of the United States.
Secondly, I urge you to oppose the resolution because it is foolish to attempt to do what by definition cannot be done. Such an attempt can only intensify confusions and conflicts, further polarizing our public life. To exclude religion is to exclude from politics the deepest moral convictions of millions of citizens—indeed, in this society, the great majority of citizens. Thus the resolution before this house is a formula for the death of democracy and should be resolutely defeated.
(HT: One Eternal Day)
27. How to Improve Your Social Skills: 8 Tips from the Last 2500 Years
(HT: Dumb Little Man)
28. Good Families Postpone Menstruation:
More research from Bruce Ellis at Arizona indicating that high investments from mom and dad enable teenage girls to postpone menstruation. This is important because girls who have menstruation at later ages are less sexually active as teens and less likely to become pregnant as teens.
29. Caligynephobia, the fear of beautiful women.
30. Social Change Relies More On The Easily Influenced Than The Highly Influential -- Rarely is it the case that highly influential individuals are responsible for bringing about shifts in public opinion. Instead, scientists find that it is the presence of large numbers of "easily influenced" people who bring about major shifts by influencing other easy-to-influence people.
31. Ouch! Men have a higher pain threshold than women -- It's a question that continues to cause friction between the sexes: who has the higher pain threshold? Now one of the most detailed investigations of its kind has reported that it's men who have the higher threshold, but only at 5 of 12 of the pairs of pressure points investigated (thresholds were the same for both sexes at the other points).
32. People can put a price tag on economic justice, economists say -- How much would you pay to live in an equitable society in which people get what they deserve and deserve what they get" Economists at Carnegie Mellon University and the Free University of Berlin have developed a mathematical model to measure the value that people place on distributive justice -- whether goods are distributed fairly among all members of society. Applying their model to pre-existing survey data, the authors found that, on average, people are willing to sacrifice about 20 percent of their disposable income to live in an equitable society --but they also found that the value a person places on equity is substantially affected by their race and educational background. Whites place a higher value on equity than non-whites, and equity is valued more by those with high levels of education than those with less education.
33. A Day's Air Traffic as Seen From Space
Designer Aaron Koblin composited a day's worth of FAA data to make some intriguing animations. (HT: In the Agora)
http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/mt/mt-trackback.cgi/4043
1
The opponents of marriage have driven biological married fathers out of the home.
Who are these "opponents of marriage," exactly, and by what means did they "drive biological married fathers out of the home?"
posted on 11.18.2007 10:29 PM2
Reg #1
Both Mike Huckebee and Chuck Norris can pucker up and kiss my fat behind because Chuck Norris does not tell ME how its going to be.
Reg #7
posted on 11.18.2007 11:15 PMI see...so now,people who oppose the death penality are FOR people being murdered? Is there any suhc thing as a religionist argument for anything that does not depict their opponents as demon possessed spawns from hell?
3
FLEXPETZ is just wrong? No way. What's wrong is single women who think other people (me) should give a rip about their stupid pet. What's wronger, is being covered in a pet's hair or having an apartment covered in its hair and/or smelling like its waste... unless you live on a farm and that pet happens to be a horse, cow, goat, sheep, donkey, pig, or chicken.
FLEXPETZ is the best thing I ever heard of. I mean, I know tons of people (single urban women) who neglect their nasty, yet beloved, pets. Instead of 10 single women = 14.3 pets... it could be 10 single women = 3 pets between them all.
Think about it. That would cut down on the total number of pets. I can't think how that could be a bad thing.
They just need FLEXPETZ cats, and the world will be a better place.
posted on 11.19.2007 12:37 AM4
Ludwig,
I see...so now,people who oppose the death penality are FOR people being murdered?
Pointing out that the death penalty appears to save lives is in no way a comment on the opponents of the death penalty. It is just research about the effects of the death penalty.
If anyone is guilty of an ad hominem attack here, it is you, and only you.
Both Mike Huckebee and Chuck Norris can pucker up and kiss my fat behind because Chuck Norris does not tell ME how its going to be.
It's a joke. Maybe it's a good joke, maybe it's a bad joke, but if you are seriously offended, you're missing the point.
I think this is a great political ad, and I am very pleased that Joe shared it with me. It's pretty funny, and very clever.
However, Gov. Huckabee can't hold a candle to Senator Thompson. He'd be a good choice for Thompson's V.P.
Senator Thompson is focused on the most important issues, and he is totally committed to applying wise principles of governance to tackling them. He's a genuine leader.
And his honest, unorthodox approach is exactly what is needed to fight the corrupt business-as-usual of national politics. Go, Fred, go!
posted on 11.19.2007 3:26 AM5
Not sure about the music claim. Having access to more music and being able to sample it, let's people listen to music they would never have heard before. For me, at least, it has resulted in me buying more music.
posted on 11.19.2007 8:55 AM6
"Pointing out that the death penalty appears to save lives is in no way a comment on the opponents of the death penalty. It is just research about the effects of the death penalty."
No...fishing random numbers of people alledgedly "saved" by killing other people is little more than a thinly veiled attempt to equate death penality opponents with accessories to murder. opposing death penality does not mean releasing murderers in the population, contrary to what this "study" clearly suggests. This whole thing is a standard demonizing tactic and you know it.
"It's a joke. Maybe it's a good joke, maybe it's a bad joke, but if you are seriously offended, you're missing the point."
posted on 11.19.2007 9:54 AMIts a joke yes but one that reflects the right's well known inclinations toward authoritarianism.
7
When 25 percent of children in a community are born outside of marriage (as among whites today) that's a serious problem. When almost 70 percent of children in a given community are born outside of marriage (as among African-Americans today) that's a tsunami blocking the intergenerational accumulation of human and social capital.
and
The bottom line: the most dangerous person in a child's life, the person most likely to abuse a child, is his mother's cohabiting boyfriend. Not the biological father. The opponents of marriage have driven biological married fathers out of the home. Feminists have convinced women that marriage is dangerous to them. The opponents of marriage never seem to take responsibility for the fact that the main alternative to marriage, cohabitation, is much more dangerous to women and their children.
Lead Raging Bee to ask:
Who are these "opponents of marriage," exactly, and by what means did they "drive biological married fathers out of the home?"
One candidate, pro-lifers who have made abortion harder to get and have given everyone who gets one guilt trips. If you're serious about being anti-abortion you better get serious about seeing more, not less, boyfriends cohabiting with mothers of children from 'previous relationships' as well as more out of wedlock births.
It will be quite a while before Joe shows you a 'Family Fact' comparing abortion rates of married versus unmarried women.
posted on 11.19.2007 11:03 AM8
Ludwig's inability to get the joke reflects the left's well-known lack of any sense of humor and its underlying anarchist tendencies.
posted on 11.19.2007 11:45 AM9
"Ludwig's inability to get the joke" might also mean the joke is old, tired, stupid, and no longer recognizable as funny (sort of like Chuck Norris himself). In any case, Brad's reference to "the left's well-known lack of any sense of humor and its underlying anarchist tendencies" reflects his unwillingness to add anything more substantial to the discussion. (What does one guy's response to a joke have to do with "anarchist tendencies?" Or is this another joke?)
posted on 11.19.2007 11:57 AM10
Because the joke itself was supposed to reveal the right's authoritarian issues. So I made the joke that his rejection of an authoritarian model is because he's an anarchist, which is supposed to be silly, just like his comment.
But since you neither got my joke or Huckabee's, I wonder if you would consider yourself leftist? If so, I may have really stumbled upon something here.
posted on 11.19.2007 12:21 PM11
Typo correction to URL:
http://theologica.blogspot.com/2007/11/grudems-advice-on-interpreting-word.html
posted on 11.19.2007 12:28 PM12
From the link on "Debunking the Resurrection Fable Fable"
Those are secular scholars' dates; conservative Christians might date it earlier. So the fable had to have arisen and developed in no less than 3 to 4 decades after Jesus' death in 30 AD. Is that reasonable? Could a false story like that have come to life in less then 40 years, while some of Jesus' followers and critics were still around to tell what really happened?
Well actually yes. On a much more minor scale we've had people who've believed Elvis was still alive long after his death even in an age of modern communications where anyone could tune in and listen to people who lived with Elvis and were 100% confident he had really died. Thousands of years ago people did not have such good communication and books circulated rarely and only among elites.
Imagine a false story spreading even when the people who were in position to know first-hand were still alive to set the record straight.
First those in the know would have to hear the false story. Would they? It's not like you could just look at a web site to see what was being said 1000 miles away in the capital city. You probably couldn't even hear what people outside your class were saying. And as far as writing, forget about it. There were no printing presses. Books were copied by hand so its not like those in the know would get a free copy in the mail as a courtsey.
Second, those in the know would have to act to counter the first story? Could they? Writing a single person a letter and getting it to him was tricky back then, assuming you knew how to write or could pay someone to honestly write down your words. After that it would be up to the receiver of the letter to notify all the people he told that his story has been 'corrected'.
Third, their efforts to counter the false story would have to spread faster than the false story in order to 'catch up' to it and put a stop to it. As we have seen with the 'Gnostic Gospels' there was a lot of stories, manuscripts and ideas floating around at that time. No doube we still only have a fraction of the written record but the written record is probably the tip of the iceberg compared to all the verbal stories that were passed around without ever being put on paper. Hypothetically imagine a small band who actually knew Jesus first-hand dedicated themselves to countering false stories, they would be confronted with a difficult battle...especially if their 'correction' was a let down (such as no supernatural ressurection).
False stories spread because they are appealing and often the truth is at a disadvantage because it is less appealing. Recently there was a story on myth debunking being counterproductive because often people will remember the myths supposedly debunked but forget the debunking. I'm not saying this happened with the ressurection but it is not objective to pretend logic or human nature would rule it out.
posted on 11.19.2007 12:31 PM13
Love the pitch illustrated site!
posted on 11.19.2007 8:19 PM14
Joe, I just want to say thanks for the link. I appreciate it!
posted on 11.23.2007 7:02 PM15
Thank you.
posted on 11.27.2007 3:58 AM16
So, does this mean you think the story of the resurrection of Christ is a fable Boonton?
posted on 11.28.2007 7:53 AM