March 4, 2004

Fascism as Theater


Finding out that the Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl was posthumously honored at the Academy Awards came as quite a surprise. But finding she had an unlikely admirer was even more shocking:

"Yes, Hitler was evil, but I think it was proper to have her name there," Elton John told the paper. "She was a great filmmaker, and as an artist myself, I think she deserved to be there."

Why an openly homosexual Brit would choose to defend a German director who hung out with Hitler is beyond my level of comprehension. I don't presume to understand why Sir Elton would make such a comment and I don't want to resort to amateur psychoanalysis to try to rationalize his statement. But it does provide an opportunity to point out the fascination with Nazi symbolism that has been an undercurrent of the homosexual sub-culture for over forty years.

In her collection of essays Under the Sign of Saturn, Susan Sontag includes a piece entitled 'Fascinating Fascism” that discusses Riefenstahl, the Nazis, and why some male homosexuals are enthralled by Fascism. Here is a brief excerpt:

In pornographic literature, films, and gadgetry throughout the world, especially in the United States, England, France, Japan, Scandinavia, Holland, and Germany, the SS has become a referent of sexual adventurism. Much of the imagery of far-out sex has been placed under the sign of Nazism. Boots, leather, chains, Iron Crosses on gleaming torsos, swastikas, along with meat hooks and heavy motorcycles, have become the secret and most lucrative paraphernalia of eroticism. In the sex shops, the baths, the leather bars, the brothels, people are dragging out their gear. But why? Why has Nazi Germany, which was a sexually repressive society, become erotic? How could a regime which persecuted homosexuals become a gay turn-on?

A clue lies in the predilections of the fascist leaders themselves for sexual metaphors. Like Nietzsche and Wagner, Hitler regarded leadership as sexual mastery of the "feminine" masses, as rape. (The expression of the crowds in Triumph of the Will is one of ecstasy; the leader makes the crowd come.) Left-wing movements have tended to be unisex, and asexual in their imagery. Right-wing movements, however puritanical and repressive the realities they usher in, have an erotic surface. Certainly Nazism is "sexier" than communism (which is not to the Nazis' credit, but rather shows something of the nature and limits of the sexual imagination).

Of course, most people who are turned on by SS uniforms are not signifying approval of what the Nazis did, if indeed they have more than the sketchiest idea of what that might be. Nevertheless, there are powerful and growing currents of sexual feeling, those that generally go by the name of sadomasochism, which make playing at Nazism seem erotic. These sadomasochistic fantasies and practices are to be found among heterosexuals as well as homosexuals, although it is among male homosexuals that the eroticizing of Nazism is most visible. S-m, not swinging, is the big sexual secret of the last few years.

Between sadomasochism and fascism there is a natural link. "Fascism is theater," as Genet said.5 As is sadomasochistic sexuality: to be involved in sadomasochism is to take part in a sexual theater, a staging of sexuality. Regulars of sadomasochistic sex are expert costumers and choreographers as well as performers, in a drama that is all the more exciting because it is forbidden to ordinary people. Sadomasochism is to sex what war is to civil life: the magnificent experience. (Riefenstahl put it: "What is purely realistic, slice of life, what is average, quotidian, doesn't interest me." As the social contract seems tame in comparison with war, so f***ing and s****ing come to seem merely nice, and therefore unexciting. The end to which all sexual experience tends, as Bataille insisted in a lifetime of writing, is defilement, blasphemy. To be "nice," as to be civilized, means being alienated from this savage experience—which is entirely staged.


comments
Mike writes:

1

Not to nitpick or anything but Germany wasn't Fascist, it was National Socialist. Fascism is a distinct post-Socialist ideology that embraces limited private property rights as an expediant to getting people to work.

posted on 03.04.2004 9:05 AM
dicknbush writes:

2

fascism also involves controlling the media doesn't it? or is that a modern connotation

posted on 03.04.2004 10:09 AM
writes:

3

From my experience, homosexual men tend to have controlling, totalitarian personalities (control-freaks), so of course they would admire totalitarian Germany. Notice the overthrow of our government they are staging right now because they don't agree with the democratically voted laws that are in place. They will not put up with anybody who doesn't wholeheartedly endorse and praise their views, tolerance is not the issue.

posted on 03.04.2004 11:20 AM
dicknbush writes:

4

biggotry in 2004. amazing. if you had read the article, it staed that sadomasicism is the link to the SS, which is not limited to homosexuals. it is also practiced among strait couples.

gay marriage is about equal rights not control. control would mean they want everyone to gay. oh wait, that is what the 'moral majority' want.

btw, i'm not gay, but a have friends and family that are.

posted on 03.04.2004 11:30 AM
Chris Curry writes:

5

Is it not possible that Elton John admires her for being an artist, apart from her social politics or affiliations? I'm not familiar with her work so she could be a horribly corrupted artist for all I know, but it seems that Elton John is admiring her as an artist, much the same way secularists can admire works like the Passion of Christ, outside of any religious belief, but rather through general revelation.

posted on 03.04.2004 6:44 PM
Joe Carter writes:

6

Chris,

That's always a possibility, though L.R.'s movies are documentary-style works about the Third Reich. I suppose a person could enjoy a snuff film on its technical merits but at some point noxious content overwhelms the art itself.

I do, however, think you are are probably right. That was Elton's rational for appearing at the Grammy's with the homophobic Eminem.

posted on 03.04.2004 7:32 PM
Ed Jordan writes:

7

d-n-b,

I think dissent and challenging comments are valuable, but I don't know why you insist on using the most offensive possible version of your name on your posts -- or, if it's not your real name, why you insist on making up an obscene nickname for yourself.

Let us call you something friendlier -- may we call you "Richard"? Come sit at the dinner table with us, Richard. Disagree with us, but do it like part of the family instead of like a tough guy with a pornographic t-shirt.

posted on 03.05.2004 10:56 PM