December 29, 2003

Notes on Blogging #9
Paris Hilton's Tips for the Striving Blogger


In a post entitled "Look at my Navel", Eloise from Spitbull poses an interesting question: Is there any way to generalize about what posts people find interesting?

Actually, there is a way. If you post about matters relating to sex or blogging then you are sure to attract an audience. In fact, I truly believe that if I could find a way to way to combine those two topics in every post I could rival Glenn Reynolds for dominance of the blogosphere.

While such articles would invariably garner attention for my blog, it would only be of the reality-TV-show-contestant variety. The person willing to shed their dignity in order to gain attention and popularity has become a modern archetype. And while the blogosphere undoubtedly has its share of those willing to become a cliché for their 15-seconds in the spotlight, most of us want to be taken seriously.

As Elosie goes on to add:

The two most significant features of blogging are, to my mind: (1) it's interactive; (2) it's cheap to free. Both features are important not only to blog visitors but also to bloggers. We bloggers do this for free (almost always) and one form of non-monetary recompense we receive is the illusion that people find what we write to be of interest.

I think Eloise is absolutely right. Influence is the coin of the realm in blogdom and to have influence you must have an audience. That is why bloggers can be divided into four camps: The Agenda-Setters, The Peers, The Strivers, and the Navel-Gazers.

The Navel-Gazers tend to be online diarists and other introspective types who aren’t concerned about gaining an audience or readership. They find Strivers, those bloggers who believe they have something worthy to say and want others to hear it, as being rather pathetic and needy.

The Peers are those who have already established themselves in the media elite. Take, for example, James Lileks. He doesn’t often add a new meme nor is he typically the first with a newsworthy story. He doesn't do those things because he doesn't have to. Lileks gains readers, not because he sets the topic of conversation in the way a Matt Drudge does, but because he has a quirky, humorous voice that is unfailingly interesting. Lilek's has the ear, and is on almost every blogroll, of the Agenda-Setters.

The Agenda-Setters are the ones on the top rung of the ladder. They decide which news stories and topics will gain widespread attention in the blogosphere. The Instapundit is the king of this group. When he gets loads of email on cookware it isn’t because the blogosphere is infested with Martha Stewart-wannabes bur rather because the King has an interest and the Strivers believe if they can play cupbearer they will earn a spot in the royal court. Once they have the King’s ear on pots and pans, they reason, he will take notice of their profound insights on the foreign policy of Myanmar.

The question, at least for the Strivers, is how to move to the level of Agenda-Setter. In my opinion, there are two ways to go about this process. The first is to possess an interesting viewpoint and build a small, but solid audience that is willing to spread your ideas and opinions. Once you start setting micro-agendas you will increase your chances of broadening your audience. This is why it is essential for Agenda-Strivers to have as many interactive tools as possible. Without the ability to collect comments and feedback, you are unlikely to be able to shape the “cultural conversation” in any significant way.

The second approach is the old Suck-Up method. While sucking-up to one’s superiors has always been frowned upon by peers and subordinates, its effective track record is hard to ignore. The key is to find a common interest and put a unique spin on it. For example, since most of the top tier bloggers are lawyers and journalists, a Striver must have something worthwhile to contribute to discussions of law and media. Take an interest in the interest of powerful people and they will take an interest in you.

As a last resort, however, you could simply change your blog’s name to “Paris Hilton’s Video Tips on Law, Blogging, Howard Dean, George Bush, and the Media.” You may not gain much of an influence, but the Google traffic should provide some consolation.

[Note: You can find the rest of the Notes on Blogging series here.]


comments
the elder writes:

1

Joe- Nice work. I was unaware of your ongoing series on blogging until this post, but it is quite astute, particularly #6 "the myth of the discovered blogger". Despite the oft proclaimed meritocracy of the blogosphere, real success is still predicated, with a few exceptions, on what you do for a living, who you know, and where you went to school.

posted on 12.29.2003 5:55 PM
Bene Diction writes:

2

I agree. Nice work JP.
I'd be interested in hearing about how US agenda-setters and strivers can incorporate others, particularily internationally. (example: BuzzMachine) Blog on!

posted on 12.29.2003 6:11 PM
J.P. Carter writes:

3

Elder,

Thanks. I took a lot of flak for that post but it was simply a sociological observation. Too many people have delusions of granduer when it comes to blogging. Credentialism still carries weight, even in the blogsosphere. If you have it coming in then you can step to the head of the line. Otherwise, join us in the back and fight for the link-scraps.

posted on 12.29.2003 6:12 PM
Jim writes:

4

Hell, I'm striving just for delusions of adequacy. Granduer can wait till I add a Pay-Pal account.


Jim
Sloop New Dawn
Galveston, TX

posted on 12.29.2003 8:25 PM