For the past week I've been analyzing some of the top tier blogs in order to gain a better understanding of what makes them successful. In my haste I had failed to define exactly what "success" means when it comes to our chosen forum. While I was gathering my thoughts on the subject, Bill Wallo beat me to the punch by writing an excellent post on how the definition of success is not a one-size-fits-all concept. Since I couldn't possibly explain it better, I'll defer to his post.
There are, however, a few key points that I would like to add. While I think my "Notes on Blogging" series will be of at least passing interest to most bloggers, there is a key demographic that I have in mind.
Like a handful of others, I was influenced to start a blog by Hugh Hewitt While reading his recent book "In, But Not Of", I was struck by his statement that, "In a liberal democracy, power, authority, and influence go only to those who seek them." The rest of the book elaborates on this point by providing a Christian perspective on how to acquire influence.
Hewitt considers blogging to be the most important communications development of the new century. For those who desire to acquire influence it is imperative for them to "join the revolution." He advises studying the key blogs (Instapundit, Kausfiles, Dynamist, Volokh Conspiracy, and Power line) and I've tried to take this advice seriously. In fact, it's only through studying these blogs that I've come to disagree with my adopted mentor when he says:
Because blogging is the genuine marketplace of ideas, your site will prosper if you are any good. And so will your reputation -- if it deserves to.
My analysis is beginning to show that this isn't entirely accurate. While you will surely fail if you aren't any good, excellence alone may not be enough.* My purpose is to find and illuminate for the deserving blogger the means to gain entry into the top tier. Once they arrive, reputation and skill will have to keep them there.
I'll save one important aspect of success -- the relationship between audience and influence --for a future post.
*Let me clarify that my reference to excellence in blogging does not refer to my own site. Not only do I consider myself an "average" blogger but I have doubts that my writing and/or analytic ability will be able to carry me very far. Nevertheless, I believe that I can be useful to those who are more talented by providing them with any insights I obtain on the journey.
1
I, for one, am enjoying your thoughts on this subject. There are always those sites which skyrocket to the top, which I find quite devoid of content and thought and composition. On the flip side, there are those which I believe are extremely high quality yet founder along without mention or notice.
Of course, this must mean that my tastes are far from mainstream!
posted on 11.17.2003 5:16 PM2
For me, success is twofolld. First, I've been able to teach the webmasters how to present themselves better online ... which extremely important as I continue to encouter people who inform me they use the web to check out a church online before they walk through the door.
Second, I've been able to use my bully pulipit to light a fire under online Bible publishers. The result, API's and feeds that are now easy to plug-n-pray into one's website ... which in turn propogates the Gospel to places a hard copy isn't readily accessible.
Everything else is just navel gazing.
posted on 11.18.2003 8:28 AM3
I really enjoy the "Notes on Blogging" series. It's got me looking at what I need to do to make my blog more improved and relevant. If only there was more time in the day...
posted on 11.18.2003 10:16 AM4
EMAIL: master-x@canada.com
IP: 82.146.43.155
URL: http://www.americanpaydayloans.net
DATE: 02/27/2004 05:52:56 AM
Be wiser than other people if you can; but do not tell them so.